Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Barker, 2:15-cv-0062 JAM DB PS. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190122c80 Visitors: 30
Filed: Jan. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER DEBORAH BARNES , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Randy Barker is proceeding in this action pro se. Therefore, the matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). (ECF No. 59.) On December 12, 2018, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations recommending, in part, that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment be granted. (ECF No. 70.) On January 9, 2019, defendant filed an ex parte request for a 60-day extension of time t
More

ORDER

Defendant Randy Barker is proceeding in this action pro se. Therefore, the matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). (ECF No. 59.) On December 12, 2018, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations recommending, in part, that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment be granted. (ECF No. 70.)

On January 9, 2019, defendant filed an ex parte request for a 60-day extension of time to file objections to those findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 72.) Defendant explains that the extension of time is necessary due to an area fire and the "Government Shutdown." (Id.) Good cause appearing, defendant's request will be granted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's January 9, 2019 motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 72) is granted; and

2. Defendant shall file objections, if any, to the December 12, 2018 findings and recommendations on or before March 1, 2019.1

FootNotes


1. Defendant is cautioned that the undersigned does not intend to grant any further extensions of time for this purpose absent a showing of good cause.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer