Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Clark v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 18-0332V. (2019)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: infdco20190530c34 Visitors: 16
Filed: Mar. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 27, 2019
Summary: UNPUBLISHED DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1 NORA BETH DORSEY , Chief Special Master . On March 5, 2018, Derek Clark ("petitioner") filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a right shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ("SIRVA") as a result of an influenza ("flu") vaccine administered to his right shoulder on November 15, 2016. Petition at 1.
More

UNPUBLISHED

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On March 5, 2018, Derek Clark ("petitioner") filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a right shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ("SIRVA") as a result of an influenza ("flu") vaccine administered to his right shoulder on November 15, 2016. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On February 27, 2019, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On March 27, 2019, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation ("Proffer") indicating petitioner should be awarded $57,239.95 (representing $52,500.00 in pain and suffering and $4,739.95 in past unreimbursable expenses). Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards petitioner a lump sum payment of $57,239.95 (representing $52,500.00 in pain and suffering and $4,739.95 in past unreimbursable expenses) in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Derek Clark. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RESPONDENT'S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

On March 5, 2018, Derek Clark ("petitioner") filed a petition for vaccine injury compensation alleging that he suffered a right shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ("SIRVA"), a Table injury, following receipt of an influenza ("flu") vaccination administered on November 15, 2016. Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) Report conceding entitlement to compensation on February 27, 2019. The Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement that same day.

I. Items of Compensation

A. Pain and Suffering

Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $52,500.00 in pain and suffering. Petitioner agrees.

B. Past Unreimbursable Expenses

Evidence supplied by petitioner documents his expenditure of past unreimbursable expenses related to his vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $4,739.95. Petitioner agrees.

II. Form of the Award

Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment of $57,239.95 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.1,2 Petitioner agrees.

FootNotes


1. The undersigned intends to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).
2. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all "§" references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
3. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties' joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
1. Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.
2. Petitioner is a competent adult. Proof of guardianship is not required in this case.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer