WILDER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 6:14-cv-1445-Orl-41KRS. (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20150515c39
Visitors: 37
Filed: May 14, 2015
Latest Update: May 14, 2015
Summary: ORDER CARLOS E. MENDOZA , District Judge . THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant's Consent Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand (the "Consent Motion," Doc. 17). United States Magistrate Judge Karla R. Spaulding submitted a Report and Recommendation, which recommends that the Consent Motion be granted, the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security be reversed, and this case be remanded for further proceedings. (Doc. 18, at 2). Judge Spaulding also recommends that the Cl
Summary: ORDER CARLOS E. MENDOZA , District Judge . THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant's Consent Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand (the "Consent Motion," Doc. 17). United States Magistrate Judge Karla R. Spaulding submitted a Report and Recommendation, which recommends that the Consent Motion be granted, the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security be reversed, and this case be remanded for further proceedings. (Doc. 18, at 2). Judge Spaulding also recommends that the Cle..
More
ORDER
CARLOS E. MENDOZA, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant's Consent Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand (the "Consent Motion," Doc. 17). United States Magistrate Judge Karla R. Spaulding submitted a Report and Recommendation, which recommends that the Consent Motion be granted, the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security be reversed, and this case be remanded for further proceedings. (Doc. 18, at 2). Judge Spaulding also recommends that the Clerk be directed to enter judgment accordingly. (Id.).
After an independent de novo review of the record and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation.
Therefore, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 18) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.
2. The Consent Motion (Doc. 17) is GRANTED.
3. The Commissioner's final decision in this case is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the Consent Motion.
4. Upon remand, Defendant shall direct the Appeals Council to instruct the Administrative Law Judge to: (1) clarify the nature and severity of the claimant's intellectual disability impairment; (2) further evaluate whether the claimant's impairment satisfies the criteria of listing 12.05; and (3) obtain testimony from a medical expert.
5. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
