Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

NIMLEY v. PTT PHONE CARDS INC., 13-2216. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20140513d67 Visitors: 10
Filed: Apr. 15, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 15, 2014
Summary: ORDER MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, District Judge. AND NOW, this 14th day of April, 2014, upon consideration of Defendant's Notice of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Under Rule 12(b)(6) and 12(f) (Docket No. 9), and the opposition and reply thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, for the reasons stated in a memorandum of law bearing today's date, that the defendant's motion is GRANTED. 1 This case is dismissed. The plaintiff's breach of implied-in-fact contract and unjust enrichment claims are dismiss
More

ORDER

MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 14th day of April, 2014, upon consideration of Defendant's Notice of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Under Rule 12(b)(6) and 12(f) (Docket No. 9), and the opposition and reply thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, for the reasons stated in a memorandum of law bearing today's date, that the defendant's motion is GRANTED.1 This case is dismissed.

The plaintiff's breach of implied-in-fact contract and unjust enrichment claims are dismissed with prejudice.

The plaintiff's claim under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act is dismissed without prejudice. The plaintiff may file an amended complaint to re-plead the claim dismissed without prejudice within 30 days of the date of this Order.

FootNotes


1. To the extent the defendant has moved to strike the class allegations, the Court denies that motion as moot.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer