Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Lozada v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Department, 2:18-cv-01102-JAM-KJN. (2019)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20190326879 Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 22, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS JIM BROWN AND FULTON-EL CAMINO RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff Paul Lozada and defendants Jim Brown and Fulton-El Camino Recreation and Park District hereby stipulate that plaintiff's action herein against defendants Jim Brown and Fulton-El Camino Recreation and Park District be dismissed, with prejudice, in accordance with the terms o
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS JIM BROWN AND FULTON-EL CAMINO RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff Paul Lozada and defendants Jim Brown and Fulton-El Camino Recreation and Park District hereby stipulate that plaintiff's action herein against defendants Jim Brown and Fulton-El Camino Recreation and Park District be dismissed, with prejudice, in accordance with the terms of a written settlement agreement entered into between the above parties.

It has been further stipulated that the above parties shall bear their own attorney's fees and costs.

Plaintiff's claims against the remaining defendants are not dismissed.

ORDER

The stipulation is approved. Plaintiff's action herein against defendants Jim Brown and Fulton-El Camino Recreation and Park District is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer