SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on United States Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy's Report and Recommendation filed on May 3, 2016. (Doc. #29). Judge McCoy recommends denying Defendant Dyck-O'Neal's Motion to Deny Class Certification (Doc. #24) as moot because Plaintiff Jessica Hernandez does not oppose Defendant's motion (Doc. #28). The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to do so has expired. Thus, the Report and Recommendation is ripe for review.
After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994).
After independently examining the file and upon considering Judge McCoy's findings and recommendations, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation (Doc. #29).
Accordingly, it is now