GOODMAN v. J.P. MORGAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC., 2:14-cv-414 (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20170106h49
Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 13, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 13, 2016
Summary: ORDER EDMUND A. SARGUS, Jr. , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Certain Claims and Parties [`15 ECF No. 61; `14 ECF No. 92]. Based upon the Motion and the consent of each party to the relief requested, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' Motion and ORDERS as follows: 1. Plaintiff Joseph Lipovich is DISMISSED from the case; 2. All claims asserted by Plaintiffs regarding, and on behalf of, the J.P. Morgan Strategic Income Opportuniti
Summary: ORDER EDMUND A. SARGUS, Jr. , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Certain Claims and Parties [`15 ECF No. 61; `14 ECF No. 92]. Based upon the Motion and the consent of each party to the relief requested, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' Motion and ORDERS as follows: 1. Plaintiff Joseph Lipovich is DISMISSED from the case; 2. All claims asserted by Plaintiffs regarding, and on behalf of, the J.P. Morgan Strategic Income Opportunitie..
More
ORDER
EDMUND A. SARGUS, Jr., District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Certain Claims and Parties [`15 ECF No. 61; `14 ECF No. 92]. Based upon the Motion and the consent of each party to the relief requested, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' Motion and ORDERS as follows:
1. Plaintiff Joseph Lipovich is DISMISSED from the case;
2. All claims asserted by Plaintiffs regarding, and on behalf of, the J.P. Morgan Strategic Income Opportunities Fund are DISMISSED; and
3. All claims asserted by Plaintiff Jacqueline Peiffer regarding, and on behalf of, the J.P. Morgan Mid Cap Value Fund are DISMISSED, without prejudice to the claims asserted by other Plaintiffs with regard to the same fund.
Each party will bear its own fees and costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
