United States ex rel. Hartnett v. Physicians Choice Laboratory Services, 3:17-CV-037-FDW-DCK. (2020)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20200207d27
Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 06, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 06, 2020
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the "Joint Motion To Stay Discovery And Modify Case Management Order" (Document No. 97) filed February 5, 2020. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, the undersigned will deny the motion. The parties' motion seeks to stay this matter pending resolution of "Defendant Philip McHugh's Motion To Dismiss . . ." (Document No. 73); however, shortly after the motion to stay was filed, the Court issu
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the "Joint Motion To Stay Discovery And Modify Case Management Order" (Document No. 97) filed February 5, 2020. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, the undersigned will deny the motion. The parties' motion seeks to stay this matter pending resolution of "Defendant Philip McHugh's Motion To Dismiss . . ." (Document No. 73); however, shortly after the motion to stay was filed, the Court issue..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the "Joint Motion To Stay Discovery And Modify Case Management Order" (Document No. 97) filed February 5, 2020. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, the undersigned will deny the motion.
The parties' motion seeks to stay this matter pending resolution of "Defendant Philip McHugh's Motion To Dismiss . . ." (Document No. 73); however, shortly after the motion to stay was filed, the Court issued an Order denying the motion to dismiss and directing the parties to proceed with discovery. See (Document No. 98).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the "Joint Motion To Stay Discovery And Modify Case Management Order" (Document No. 97) is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle