Filed: May 04, 2015
Latest Update: May 04, 2015
Summary: ORDER MARCIA MORALES HOWARD , District Judge . THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 13; Report), entered by the Honorable Philip R. Lammens, United States Magistrate Judge, on March 25, 2015. In the Report, Magistrate Judge Lammens recommends that Plaintiff's Motion for Final Default Judgment and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Dkt. No. 12) be granted and that Plaintiff be awarded damages for her unpaid overtime wages, as well as liquidated damages, in
Summary: ORDER MARCIA MORALES HOWARD , District Judge . THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 13; Report), entered by the Honorable Philip R. Lammens, United States Magistrate Judge, on March 25, 2015. In the Report, Magistrate Judge Lammens recommends that Plaintiff's Motion for Final Default Judgment and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Dkt. No. 12) be granted and that Plaintiff be awarded damages for her unpaid overtime wages, as well as liquidated damages, in ..
More
ORDER
MARCIA MORALES HOWARD, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 13; Report), entered by the Honorable Philip R. Lammens, United States Magistrate Judge, on March 25, 2015. In the Report, Magistrate Judge Lammens recommends that Plaintiff's Motion for Final Default Judgment and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Dkt. No. 12) be granted and that Plaintiff be awarded damages for her unpaid overtime wages, as well as liquidated damages, in the total amount of $4,180.00. See Report at 13. Defendants have failed to file objections to the Report, and the time for doing so has now passed.
The Court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). If no specific objections to findings of facts are filed, the district court is not required to conduct a de novo review of those findings. See Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, the district court must review legal conclusions de novo. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); United States v. Rice, No. 2:07-mc-8-FtM-29SPC, 2007 WL 1428615, at * 1 (M.D. Fla. May 14, 2007).
Upon independent review of the file and for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge's Report, the Court will accept and adopt the legal and factual conclusions recommended by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED:
1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 13) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.
2. Plaintiff's Motion for Final Default Judgment and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Dkt. No. 12) is GRANTED.
3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff Candy Townsend and against Defendants Let's Of Ocala LLC and Let's Of Ocala II, LLC in the total amount of $4,180.00 for her unpaid overtime wages, as well as liquidated damages.
4. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to terminate any pending motions and close the file.
5. Plaintiff may file a motion for attorney's fees and costs on or before June 1, 2015.
DONE AND ORDERED.
