Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Arroyo v. Commissioner of Social Security, 6:16-cv-1862-Orl-22TBS. (2018)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20180626a50 Visitors: 19
Filed: Jun. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 25, 2018
Summary: ORDER AND AMENDMENT TO DECEMBER 2, 2017 ORDER ANNE C. CONWAY , District Judge . This cause is before the Court on the Commissioner's Unopposed Motion to Correct Order Pursuant to Rule 60(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Doc. No. 28) filed on June 1, 2018. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the Motion be GRANTED. After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court
More

ORDER AND AMENDMENT TO DECEMBER 2, 2017 ORDER

This cause is before the Court on the Commissioner's Unopposed Motion to Correct Order Pursuant to Rule 60(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Doc. No. 28) filed on June 1, 2018.

The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the Motion be GRANTED.

After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation.

Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation filed June 4, 2018 (Doc. No. 29), is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.

2. The Commissioner's Unopposed Motion to Correct Order Pursuant to Rule 60(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is hereby GRANTED NUNC PRO TUNC.

3. Specifically, the Court REJECTS the portion of the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 22) entered November 13, 2017 providing: "The Commissioner's favorable decision regarding Plaintiff's disability status after May 27, 2015 remain undisturbed."

4. The Court's Order (Doc. No. 23) entered December 2, 2017 is hereby AMENDED to delete paragraph 3: "3. The Commissioner's favorable decision regardingPlaintiff's disability status after May 27, 2015 shall remain undisturbed."

5. The Amendment to the Order does not serve to alter the judgment (Doc. No. 24), re-open the case, or revive any case related deadlines.

DONE and ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer