Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

SCHMIDTKE v. DEAN, 5:10-cv-293-Oc-10GRJ. (2012)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20120323939 Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2012
Summary: ORDER THOMAS B. SMITH, Magistrate Judge. On March 9, 2012, this Court entered its Order (Doc. 50), directing Plaintiff to notify the Court as to whether he intends to employ counsel or continue to prosecute this case pro se. The Court stated that an earlier trial date will be scheduled if Plaintiff notifies the Court that he intends to obtain counsel. In Plaintiff's Response on Order Document #50 by Honorable U.S. Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith, Requesting as to Plaintiff's Intentions of P
More

ORDER

THOMAS B. SMITH, Magistrate Judge.

On March 9, 2012, this Court entered its Order (Doc. 50), directing Plaintiff to notify the Court as to whether he intends to employ counsel or continue to prosecute this case pro se. The Court stated that an earlier trial date will be scheduled if Plaintiff notifies the Court that he intends to obtain counsel. In Plaintiff's Response on Order Document #50 by Honorable U.S. Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith, Requesting as to Plaintiff's Intentions of Proceeding Pro Se or Employing Counsel, (Doc. No. 51), Plaintiff has informed the Court that he will be proceeding pro se and he has asked the Court to abate this case until after July 29, — which is his projected release date from prison. Now, the Court directs the Defendants to notify the Court within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS of the date of this Order as to whether they oppose the relief requested by Plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer