Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CANTWELL v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, 17-0004V. (2017)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: infdco20180124b15 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 19, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 19, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1 NORA BETH DORSEY , Chief Special Master . On January 3, 2017, James Cantwell ("petitioner") filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner sought compensation for the death of his son, M.C., on March 3, 2015, allegedly due to intussusception following a rotavirus vaccination, which was administered on February 15, 2015. The case was assigne
More

UNPUBLISHED

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On January 3, 2017, James Cantwell ("petitioner") filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner sought compensation for the death of his son, M.C., on March 3, 2015, allegedly due to intussusception following a rotavirus vaccination, which was administered on February 15, 2015. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On May 18, 2017, the undersigned issued a ruling on entitlement, finding petitioner entitled to compensation. On July 19, 2017, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation ("Proffer") indicating petitioner, as legal representative of the estate of M.C., should be awarded $360,415.00. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards petitioner a lump sum payment of $360,415.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner as the legal representative of the estate of M.C. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a) for M.C.'s vaccine-related injury and death.

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

I. Items of Compensation

For purposes of this proffer, the term "vaccine-related" is as described in Respondent's Rule 4(c) Report, filed on May 17, 2017, conceding entitlement in this case. Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner, as legal representative of the estate of M.C., should be awarded $360,415.00, which represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) for M.C.'s vaccine-related injury and death. Petitioner agrees.

II. Form of the Award

Respondent recommends that the compensation should be made through a lump sum payment of $360,415.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner as the legal representative of the estate of M.C. Petitioner agrees.

No payment shall be made until petitioner provides respondent with documentation that he has been appointed the legal representative of M.C.'s estate.

Respectfully submitted, CHAD A. READLER Acting Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D'ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division CATHARINE E. REEVES Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division ALEXIS B. BABCOCK Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division s/Ann D. Martin ANN D. MARTIN Senior Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Tel.: (202) 307-1815

FootNotes


1. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
2. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all "§" references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
3. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties' joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer