Canas v. Harley's Cabaret, Inc., 1:18-cv-1315. (2020)
Court: District Court, W.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20200210c28
Visitors: 247
Filed: Feb. 07, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 07, 2020
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION PAUL L. MALONEY , District Judge . Third-Party Defendants Krystal Morris and Crowdsurfer Media, LLC filed a Motion to Dismiss Third-Party Complaint. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on January 23, 2020, recommending that this Court grant the motion in part and deny the motion in part. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. 6
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION PAUL L. MALONEY , District Judge . Third-Party Defendants Krystal Morris and Crowdsurfer Media, LLC filed a Motion to Dismiss Third-Party Complaint. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on January 23, 2020, recommending that this Court grant the motion in part and deny the motion in part. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. 63..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
PAUL L. MALONEY, District Judge.
Third-Party Defendants Krystal Morris and Crowdsurfer Media, LLC filed a Motion to Dismiss Third-Party Complaint. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on January 23, 2020, recommending that this Court grant the motion in part and deny the motion in part. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 29) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for to Dismiss the Third-Party Complaint (ECF No. 18) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that (1) Harley's claim for indemnification from Morris or Crowdsurfer for an Lanham Act violations is DISMISSED; (2) Harley's negligence claim is DISMISSED; and (3) Harley's remaining claims proceed forward.
Source: Leagle
