Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

REDDICK v. SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC., 6:12-cv-189-Orl-36DAB. (2012)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20120518656 Visitors: 9
Filed: May 17, 2012
Latest Update: May 17, 2012
Summary: ORDER ROY B. DALTON, Jr., District Judge. This cause comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge David A. Baker on May 14, 2012 (Doc. 25). In the Report and Recommendation, Judge Baker recommends that the Court grant in part the parties' Joint Motion to Approve Settlement (Doc. 24), by approving the settlement and taxing $750 in fees against Defendant Swift Transportation Company, Inc. ("Defendant"). The parties filed a Notice of No Objection to the Rep
More

ORDER

ROY B. DALTON, Jr., District Judge.

This cause comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge David A. Baker on May 14, 2012 (Doc. 25). In the Report and Recommendation, Judge Baker recommends that the Court grant in part the parties' Joint Motion to Approve Settlement (Doc. 24), by approving the settlement and taxing $750 in fees against Defendant Swift Transportation Company, Inc. ("Defendant"). The parties filed a Notice of No Objection to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge on May 16, 2012 (Doc. 26). This matter is ripe for review.

The Court is in agreement with the Magistrate Judge that the settlement should be approved and that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1875(d)(2), it is appropriate to tax the Defendant $750. See 28 U.S.C. § 1875(d)(2) ("The court may tax a defendant employer, as costs payable to the court, the attorney fees and expenses incurred on behalf of a prevailing employee, where such costs were expended by the court pursuant to paragraph (1) of this subsection."). Therefore, after careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, in conjunction with an independent examination of the court file, the Court is of the opinion that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation should be adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 25) is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this order for all purposes, including appellate review.

2. The Joint Motion to Approve Settlement (Doc. 24) is GRANTED in part. The Settlement (Doc. 24, Ex. 1) is APPROVED. Defendant Swift Transportation Company, Inc. is ordered to pay $750 to the Clerk of Court within fourteen (14) days of this Order.

3. This action is DISMISSED, with prejudice.

4. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and deadlines and close this case.

DONE and ORDERED

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer