CAMPOS v. ECOLAB, INC., 16-cv-04829-PJH. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170308e42
Visitors: 19
Filed: Mar. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 06, 2017
Summary: ORDER REGARDING CASE STATUS PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON , District Judge . On November 9, 2016, the court stayed this case pursuant to a stipulation in light of ongoing settlement discussions. Dkt. 26. On January 17, 2017, the parties reported that the case had settled in mediation, and that they were working on a proposed stipulated settlement agreement. Dkt. 29. The parties anticipated that they would file a motion for preliminary settlement approval "by February 14, 2017." Id. No such motion h
Summary: ORDER REGARDING CASE STATUS PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON , District Judge . On November 9, 2016, the court stayed this case pursuant to a stipulation in light of ongoing settlement discussions. Dkt. 26. On January 17, 2017, the parties reported that the case had settled in mediation, and that they were working on a proposed stipulated settlement agreement. Dkt. 29. The parties anticipated that they would file a motion for preliminary settlement approval "by February 14, 2017." Id. No such motion ha..
More
ORDER REGARDING CASE STATUS
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge.
On November 9, 2016, the court stayed this case pursuant to a stipulation in light of ongoing settlement discussions. Dkt. 26. On January 17, 2017, the parties reported that the case had settled in mediation, and that they were working on a proposed stipulated settlement agreement. Dkt. 29. The parties anticipated that they would file a motion for preliminary settlement approval "by February 14, 2017." Id. No such motion has yet been filed.
The parties are hereby ORDERED to file, within seven days of the date of this order, a joint update regarding the current case status, including when they expect to file a motion for preliminary settlement approval.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
