Murphy v. Trader Joe's, 3:16-cv-2222-SI. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170519916
Visitors: 13
Filed: May 18, 2017
Latest Update: May 18, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE SUSAN ILLSTON , District Judge . Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties to this action, through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this action with prejudice. IT IS SO STIPULATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Pursuant to General Order No. 45 X. (B), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtaind from Defendants' counsel.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties to this action, through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this action with prejudice.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Pursuant to General Order No. 45 X. (B), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtaind from Defendants' counsel.
Source: Leagle
