Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Media.net Advertising FZ-LLC v. Netseer, Inc., 3:14-cv-03883-EMC. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160527950 Visitors: 5
Filed: May 26, 2016
Latest Update: May 26, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROP OSE D] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR MOTION OF DEFENDANT NETSEER TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (12(b)(6)) OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION TO STRIKE (RULE 12(f)) EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Plaintiff Media.net Advertising FZ-LLC and Defendant NetSeer, Inc. (the "Parties") through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS, the hearing on NetSeer's motion to dismiss second amended complaint (Rule 12(b)(6)) or, in the alt
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR MOTION OF DEFENDANT NETSEER TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (12(b)(6)) OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION TO STRIKE (RULE 12(f))

Plaintiff Media.net Advertising FZ-LLC and Defendant NetSeer, Inc. (the "Parties") through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, the hearing on NetSeer's motion to dismiss second amended complaint (Rule 12(b)(6)) or, in the alternative, motion to strike (Rule 12(f)) (Dkt. 84) is presently scheduled for June 30, 2016;

WHEREAS, counsel for Media.net will be out of the country from June 16, 2016 through June 30, 2016. (Declaration of Leeor Neta, dated May 24, 2016 ("Neta Decl."), ¶ 2);

WHEREAS, counsel for NetSeer is agreeable to a one-week continuance of the June 30, 2016 hearing (Neta Decl., ¶ 3);

WHEREAS, there have been no previous time modifications with respect to the motion to dismiss second amended complaint hearing (Neta Decl., ¶ 4);

WHEREAS, the requested time modification will have no effect on the schedule for the case (Neta Decl., ¶ 5);

WHEREAS, there is good cause for the requested continuance, no prejudice will result therefrom, and the parties seeking a continuance have acted diligently (Neta Decl., ¶ 6).

NOW THEREFORE, the parties stipulate and request an order as follows:

1. The hearing on NetSeer's motion to dismiss second amended complaint (Dkt. 84) should be continued to July 7, 2016 (or ______________ [the earliest date thereafter]) at __________________; 10:00 a.m. and

2. The briefing schedule on NetSeer's motion to dismiss second amended complaint (Dkt. 84) will remain unaffected.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer