Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Plascencia-De Haro v. Kelly, C 3:17-cv-02079-LB. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170626761 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jun. 23, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 23, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT LAUREL BEELER , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Gloria Plascencia-De Haro ("Plaintiff") and Defendants John F. Kelly, et al. ("Defendants" and collectively with Plaintiff, the "Parties") stipulate as follows: This is an immigration case arising under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 701, in which Plaintiff challenges the denial by United States Citize
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Gloria Plascencia-De Haro ("Plaintiff") and Defendants John F. Kelly, et al. ("Defendants" and collectively with Plaintiff, the "Parties") stipulate as follows:

This is an immigration case arising under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 701, in which Plaintiff challenges the denial by United States Citizenship and Immigration Services of Plaintiff's application for adjustment of status to permanent residence.

Defendants' deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this action is currently June 23, 2017.

On April 14, 2017, the Court entered an Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines ("Order"), ECF No. 4. The Order scheduled an initial case management conference ("CMC") for July 13, 2017.

The Parties have agreed to pursue additional administrative remedies that may obviate the need for further litigation. The Parties are this day filing a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference in which they are requesting an Early Settlement Conference with a Magistrate Judge. At that Early Settlement Conference, the parties intend to discuss the potential administrative remedies further with the Magistrate Judge.

To permit the Parties to do so without burdening them or the Court with additional filings or conferences, the Parties respectfully request and stipulate to an order continuing the CMC until July 20, 2017. For the same reason, the Parties respectfully request and stipulate to an order extending the Parties' time to answer or respond to the Complaint by twenty-one days, from June 23, 2017, until and including July 21, 2017.

Undersigned counsel for Defendants attests he obtained the concurrence in the filing of the document from the other electronic signatory to this stipulation.

This is the first request for modification of time in this action.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer