MOTES v. JONES, 3:16-cv-468-MCR-CJK. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20180129854
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2018
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , Chief District Judge . This cause comes before the Court on consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated September 6, 2017. ECF No. 19. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The Court has made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recom
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , Chief District Judge . This cause comes before the Court on consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated September 6, 2017. ECF No. 19. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The Court has made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recomm..
More
ORDER
M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge.
This cause comes before the Court on consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated September 6, 2017. ECF No. 19. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The Court has made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, the Court has determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. The Chief Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 15, is GRANTED;
3. The habeas petition, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED with prejudice as untimely;
3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED; and
4. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
