Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ALAM v. JOHNSON, 3:15-cv-00105 EDL. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150304a67 Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DATES and [PROPOSED] ORDER ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, by and through his attorney of record, and Defendants, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to the following: 1. In this case, Plaintiff seeks a writ of mandamus requiring the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services ("USCIS") to render a decision on his application to register permanent residence or adjust status
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DATES and [PROPOSED] ORDER

Plaintiff, by and through his attorney of record, and Defendants, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to the following:

1. In this case, Plaintiff seeks a writ of mandamus requiring the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services ("USCIS") to render a decision on his application to register permanent residence or adjust status, USCIS Form I-485.

2. Plaintiff filed this action on January 8, 2015, ECF Doc. 1, and served the United States Attorney for the Northern District of California on January 12, 2015. ECF Doc. 5. Defendants' answer is currently due on March 13, 2015.

3. On January 9, 2015, this Court entered an Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines. ECF Doc. 4.

4. On February 20, 2015, USCIS issued to Plaintiff a third Request for Evidence ("RFE") in connection with his I-485 application, asking him to provide to USCIS by May 15, 2015, certain documents and information related to his eligibility for permanent residence.

5. In order to allow USCIS sufficient time to receive and consider the documents and information requested in the February 20, 2015, RFE, and to consider an alternative resolution to this case before the parties or the Court expend additional resources and effort on this litigation, the parties hereby respectfully ask this Court to extend Defendants' time to answer, or otherwise respond to, the Complaint from Friday, March 13, 2015, until Friday, August 14, 2015.

6. Further, the parties respectfully request that the Court correspondingly extend the dates in the Court's January 9, 2015, Case Management Conference Order as follows:

a. To August 18, 2015, to meet and confer concerning initial disclosures and the other matters identified in the Court's January 9th Order as due by March 17, 2015;

b. To September 1, 2015, to file the Rule 26(f) report, and the other matters identified in the Court's January 9th Order as due by March 31, 2015; and

c. To September 8, 2015, for the initial Case Management Conference, scheduled in the Court's January 9th Order for April 7, 2015.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer