U.S. v. MADERA, 6:14-cr-225-Orl-37GJK. (2017)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20170104792
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jan. 03, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2017
Summary: ORDER ROY B. DALTON, Jr. , District Judge . This cause is before the Court on the following: 1. Defendant Wilfredo Madera's Motion for Early Termination of Supervised Release (Doc. 65), filed September 7, 2016; and 2. Defendant Wilfredo Madera's Motion for Early Termination of Supervised Release (Doc. 70), filed December 21, 2106. On January 26, 2015, the Court sentenced Defendant to fifteen months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. (Docs. 38, 39.) Defendant— proceedi
Summary: ORDER ROY B. DALTON, Jr. , District Judge . This cause is before the Court on the following: 1. Defendant Wilfredo Madera's Motion for Early Termination of Supervised Release (Doc. 65), filed September 7, 2016; and 2. Defendant Wilfredo Madera's Motion for Early Termination of Supervised Release (Doc. 70), filed December 21, 2106. On January 26, 2015, the Court sentenced Defendant to fifteen months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. (Docs. 38, 39.) Defendant— proceedin..
More
ORDER
ROY B. DALTON, Jr., District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on the following:
1. Defendant Wilfredo Madera's Motion for Early Termination of Supervised Release (Doc. 65), filed September 7, 2016; and
2. Defendant Wilfredo Madera's Motion for Early Termination of Supervised Release (Doc. 70), filed December 21, 2106.
On January 26, 2015, the Court sentenced Defendant to fifteen months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. (Docs. 38, 39.) Defendant— proceeding pro se—now requests early termination of his supervised release. (Docs. 65, 70 ("Motions").) In support of his Motions, Defendant represents that his supervised release impedes his ability to travel in order to defend other actions pending in New York state court.1 (See Doc. 65, p. 1, see also Doc. 70, p. 1.) But Defendant's inability to travel as he pleases is not a sufficient ground to warrant early termination of supervised release, nor would the interest of justice be served by granting such relief. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1). Therefore, the Court finds that Defendant's Motions are due to be denied. See id.; see also United States v. Perry, 397 F. App'x 521, 522 (11th Cir. 2010) (noting that modification of a supervised release term is a matter of discretion).
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
1. Defendant Wilfredo Madera's Motion for Early Termination of Supervised Release (Doc. 65) is DENIED.
2. Defendant Wilfredo Madera's Motion for Early Termination of Supervised Release (Doc. 70) is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Notably, the manner in which Defendant requests such relief—by letter—is prohibited by the Local Rules. See Local Rule 3.01(f). Defendant is forewarned that future submission of an application for relief in letter form may result in the summary denial of such request without consideration of the merits.
Source: Leagle
