Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Cunningham v. Fine & Dandy, LLC, 8:17-cv-2829-T-33JSS. (2018)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20180329h75 Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 29, 2018
Summary: ORDER VIRGINIA M. HERNANDEZ COVINGTON , District Judge . This matter is before the Court pursuant to the parties' Joint Motion to Approve FLSA Settlement and for Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. # 27), which was filed on March 16, 2018. At the request of the Court, the parties have filed the settlement agreement (Doc. # 29) and Plaintiff's counsel has filed additional information regarding the fees and costs incurred in the case. (Doc. # 31). After careful consideration, the Court grants the
More

ORDER

This matter is before the Court pursuant to the parties' Joint Motion to Approve FLSA Settlement and for Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. # 27), which was filed on March 16, 2018. At the request of the Court, the parties have filed the settlement agreement (Doc. # 29) and Plaintiff's counsel has filed additional information regarding the fees and costs incurred in the case. (Doc. # 31). After careful consideration, the Court grants the Motion.

I. Background

Plaintiff Daniel Cunningham filed this Fair Labor Standards Act and Florida Minimum Wage Act case against his former employers, Defendants Fine & Dandy, LLC and Andrew Kryliouk on November 22, 2017. (Doc. # 1). Defendants filed an Answer on January 2, 2018. (Doc. # 12). On January 3, 2018, the Court issued its FLSA Scheduling Order. (Doc. # 13). Plaintiff filed his Answers to the Court's Interrogatories on January 31, 2018. (Doc. # 17). Defendants filed a Verified Summary of Plaintiff's hours worked on February 23, 2018. (Doc. # 21). Thereafter, the parties reached a settlement. (Doc. # 24). At the Court's direction, the parties seek Court approval of their agreement. (Doc. # 27).

II. Analysis

Plaintiff alleges that Defendants violated the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Accordingly, any settlement reached between the parties is subject to judicial scrutiny. See Lynn's Food Stores, Inc. v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1353 (11th Cir. 1982). The parties have reached a settlement wherein it is agreed that Plaintiff will receive a total of $550.00 representing all unpaid wages and liquidated damages. It has also been agreed that Plaintiff's counsel will receive $4,450.00 in attorney's fees and costs. (Doc. # 29).

In the Motion, the parties represent that the attorney's fees to be paid to counsel were negotiated separately and without regard to the amount to be paid to Plaintiff for alleged FLSA violations. Pursuant to Bonetti v. Embarq Management Company, 715 F.Supp.2d 1222, 1228 (M.D. Fla. 2009), and other governing law, the Court approves the compromise reached by the parties in an effort to amicably settle this case. The Court requested additional information regarding the fees and costs incurred and, after review, finds that the settlement is fair and may be approved. The settlement represents a reasonable compromise of the parties' dispute.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED:

(1) The parties' Joint Motion to Approve FLSA Settlement and for Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. # 27) is GRANTED. (2) The parties' settlement is approved. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (3) The Clerk is directed to CLOSE THE CASE.

DONE and ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer