HEMPHILL v. ARAMARK CORPORATION, 14-1326. (2014)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20140820098
Visitors: 11
Filed: Aug. 20, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 20, 2014
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Eric Hemphill appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Appellees and dismissing his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hemphill v. Aramark Corp. , No. 1:12-cv-01584-ELH (D. Md. filed Mar. 25, 2014; ent
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Eric Hemphill appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Appellees and dismissing his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hemphill v. Aramark Corp. , No. 1:12-cv-01584-ELH (D. Md. filed Mar. 25, 2014; ente..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Eric Hemphill appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Appellees and dismissing his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hemphill v. Aramark Corp., No. 1:12-cv-01584-ELH (D. Md. filed Mar. 25, 2014; entered Mar. 26, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
