MARTIKEAN v. GUZMAN, 5:11-cv-00343-MP-CJK. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20140827944
Visitors: 23
Filed: Aug. 26, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 26, 2014
Summary: ORDER MAURICE M. PAUL, District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated July 7, 2014. (Doc. 68). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Plaintiff has filed objections at Doc. 69. I have made a de novo review based on those objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendati
Summary: ORDER MAURICE M. PAUL, District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated July 7, 2014. (Doc. 68). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Plaintiff has filed objections at Doc. 69. I have made a de novo review based on those objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendatio..
More
ORDER
MAURICE M. PAUL, District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated July 7, 2014. (Doc. 68). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Plaintiff has filed objections at Doc. 69. I have made a de novo review based on those objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. 68) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. Defendants' motions to dismiss (docs. 49, 63) are GRANTED.
3. The claims against Defendants Abad and Guzman are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).
4. The Clerk is directed to close the file.
Source: Leagle
