MONINGER v. STATE, 52 So.3d 696 (2010)
Court: Court of Appeals of Florida
Number: inflco20100811159
Visitors: 23
Filed: Aug. 11, 2010
Latest Update: Aug. 11, 2010
Summary: PER CURIAM. Based on the authority of State v. Montgomery, 39 So.3d 252 (Fla.2010), and this Court's recent opinion in Singh v. State, 36 So.3d 848 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010), we affirm the trial court's decision as it relates to the manner in which it instructed the jury without further discussion. Affirmed. FARMER, HAZOURI and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.
PER CURIAM.
Based on the authority of State v. Montgomery, 39 So.3d 252 (Fla.2010), and this Court's recent opinion in Singh v. State, 36 So.3d 848 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010), we affirm the trial court's decision as it relates to the manner in which it instructed the jury without further discussion.
Affirmed.
FARMER, HAZOURI and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.
Source: Leagle
