U.S. v. Gutama, 2:18-cv-00175-RSL. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20180913c03
Visitors: 29
Filed: Sep. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 06, 2018
Summary: SECOND STIPULATED MOTION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE STAY ROBERT S. LASNIK , District Judge . The United States of America ("United States" or "Plaintiff") and Victor Hugo Gutama, also known as Hugo Gutama ("Defendant"), (together, the "Parties") stipulate and jointly move, pursuant to W.D. Wash. LCR 10(g), for entry of an order continuing to stay all proceedings and deadlines in this matter for an additional 14 days, until September 17, 2018. In support of their request, the Parties sta
Summary: SECOND STIPULATED MOTION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE STAY ROBERT S. LASNIK , District Judge . The United States of America ("United States" or "Plaintiff") and Victor Hugo Gutama, also known as Hugo Gutama ("Defendant"), (together, the "Parties") stipulate and jointly move, pursuant to W.D. Wash. LCR 10(g), for entry of an order continuing to stay all proceedings and deadlines in this matter for an additional 14 days, until September 17, 2018. In support of their request, the Parties stat..
More
SECOND STIPULATED MOTION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE STAY
ROBERT S. LASNIK, District Judge.
The United States of America ("United States" or "Plaintiff") and Victor Hugo Gutama, also known as Hugo Gutama ("Defendant"), (together, the "Parties") stipulate and jointly move, pursuant to W.D. Wash. LCR 10(g), for entry of an order continuing to stay all proceedings and deadlines in this matter for an additional 14 days, until September 17, 2018. In support of their request, the Parties state the following:
1. On February 5, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Complaint to Revoke Naturalization under 8 U.S.C. § 1451(a), seeking, inter alia, judgment revoking and setting aside Defendant's naturalization and cancelling his certificate of naturalization. Dkt. # 1.
2. On April 9, 2018, pursuant to the Parties' stipulated motion, the Court entered an Order staying all proceedings and deadlines in this matter. Dkt. ## 10, 11. The stay was granted to provide the Parties with additional time to engage in discussions concerning whether this case might be resolved without further litigation and, if necessary, seek appropriate approval for any agreement. Dkt. # 10 at ¶ 4. The Court subsequently entered an Order continuing the stay for an additional 60 days, pursuant to the Parties' stipulated motion requesting additional time to work toward a potential resolution. Dkt. # 13, 14.
3. Although the Parties have been trying to determine whether this case might be resolved without further litigation, they require an additional brief continuance of the stay to work toward a potential resolution. Specifically, the Parties request that this matter be stayed for an additional 14 days, at which time they propose to file a motion to govern further proceedings or file a status report updating the Court of any developments with a proposal to govern further proceedings.
WHEREFORE, the Parties request that the Court grant this stipulated motion and continue to stay all proceedings and deadlines in this matter for an additional 14 days, until September 17, 2018, at which time the Parties propose to file a motion to govern further proceedings or file a status report updating the Court of any developments with a proposal to govern further proceedings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
