Filed: May 21, 2018
Latest Update: May 21, 2018
Summary: ORDER ENTERING DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST CROSS-CLAIM DEFENDANT VERTICAL HOLDINGS UNLIMITED, LLC, d/b/a, VHU EXPRESS ROBERT S. LASNIK , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Amazon Logistics, Inc.'s Motion for Default Judgment Against Vertical Holdings Unlimited ("Motion"). On July 5, 2016, entry of default was entered against Vertical Holdings Unlimited ("VHU") pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Thus, Amazon Logistics, Inc. ("Amazon") has complied with the requirements of Lo
Summary: ORDER ENTERING DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST CROSS-CLAIM DEFENDANT VERTICAL HOLDINGS UNLIMITED, LLC, d/b/a, VHU EXPRESS ROBERT S. LASNIK , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Amazon Logistics, Inc.'s Motion for Default Judgment Against Vertical Holdings Unlimited ("Motion"). On July 5, 2016, entry of default was entered against Vertical Holdings Unlimited ("VHU") pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Thus, Amazon Logistics, Inc. ("Amazon") has complied with the requirements of Loc..
More
ORDER ENTERING DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST CROSS-CLAIM DEFENDANT VERTICAL HOLDINGS UNLIMITED, LLC, d/b/a, VHU EXPRESS
ROBERT S. LASNIK, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Amazon Logistics, Inc.'s Motion for Default Judgment Against Vertical Holdings Unlimited ("Motion"). On July 5, 2016, entry of default was entered against Vertical Holdings Unlimited ("VHU") pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Thus, Amazon Logistics, Inc. ("Amazon") has complied with the requirements of Local Rule W.D. Wash. CR 55(b), and now seeks default judgment.
The Court, having reviewed Amazon's Motion, the accompanying declaration, and being otherwise advised in the premises, hereby GRANTS the Motion.
Accordingly, the Court ORDERS as follows:
(1) It is declared that, under the Delivery Service Provider Terms of Service and Work Orders agreed to by Amazon and VHU, VHU is required to defend and indemnify Amazon against Diversified Lenders, LLC's claims in this action; and
(2) Amazon is awarded damages in the amount of $296,906 on its cross-claims against VHU.