SMITH v. CHAPMAN, 3:15-cv-00262-MOC-DSC. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150708c72
Visitors: 23
Filed: Jul. 07, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 07, 2015
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the court on defendants' Motion to Enlarge Word Limitations on Motion and Memorandum. Unlike the companion action, which was originally before another judge who imposes a word limitation, the undersigned has no "word limitation," but simply follows the default briefing requirements contained in the Local Civil Rules. Having considered defendants' motion and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order. ORDE
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the court on defendants' Motion to Enlarge Word Limitations on Motion and Memorandum. Unlike the companion action, which was originally before another judge who imposes a word limitation, the undersigned has no "word limitation," but simply follows the default briefing requirements contained in the Local Civil Rules. Having considered defendants' motion and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order. ORDER..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the court on defendants' Motion to Enlarge Word Limitations on Motion and Memorandum. Unlike the companion action, which was originally before another judge who imposes a word limitation, the undersigned has no "word limitation," but simply follows the default briefing requirements contained in the Local Civil Rules. Having considered defendants' motion and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendants' Motion to Enlarge Word Limitations on Motion and Memorandum (#6) is DENIED as non-justiciable.
Source: Leagle
