Siemens Postal, Parcel and Airport Logistics LLC v. Pteris Global (USA), 3:19-CV-233-MOC-DCK. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20191008j58
Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 30, 2019
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on "Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion To Seal" (Document No. 42) filed September 19, 2019. In accordance with the Local Rules, the Court has considered the Motion to Seal, the public's interest in access to the affected materials, and alternatives to sealing. The Court determines that no less restrictive means other than sealing is sufficient inasmuch as Plaintiff's Supplemental Brief in Support of its Motion for Preli
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on "Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion To Seal" (Document No. 42) filed September 19, 2019. In accordance with the Local Rules, the Court has considered the Motion to Seal, the public's interest in access to the affected materials, and alternatives to sealing. The Court determines that no less restrictive means other than sealing is sufficient inasmuch as Plaintiff's Supplemental Brief in Support of its Motion for Prelim..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on "Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion To Seal" (Document No. 42) filed September 19, 2019. In accordance with the Local Rules, the Court has considered the Motion to Seal, the public's interest in access to the affected materials, and alternatives to sealing. The Court determines that no less restrictive means other than sealing is sufficient inasmuch as Plaintiff's Supplemental Brief in Support of its Motion for Preliminary Injunction contains sensitive and private information that is inappropriate for public access. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, and noting consent of Defendants' counsel, the undersigned will grant the motion.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that "Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion To Seal" (Document No. 42) is GRANTED, and (Document No. 43) is sealed until further Order of this Court.
Source: Leagle
