Filed: Feb. 26, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 26, 2015
Summary: DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1 NORA BETH DORSEY , Special Master . On December 20, 2001, [REDACTED\] ("petitioner") filed a petition pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 2 42 U.S.C. 300aa-1 to -34 (2006). Petitioner alleged that he suffered from small nerve fiber neuropathy as a result of receiving hepatitis B vaccinations on May 5, 1999, and June 11, 1999. A Ruling on Entitlement was issued on May 24, 2013, where the special master then assigned to the case fou
Summary: DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1 NORA BETH DORSEY , Special Master . On December 20, 2001, [REDACTED\] ("petitioner") filed a petition pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 2 42 U.S.C. 300aa-1 to -34 (2006). Petitioner alleged that he suffered from small nerve fiber neuropathy as a result of receiving hepatitis B vaccinations on May 5, 1999, and June 11, 1999. A Ruling on Entitlement was issued on May 24, 2013, where the special master then assigned to the case foun..
More
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
NORA BETH DORSEY, Special Master.
On December 20, 2001, [REDACTED\] ("petitioner") filed a petition pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006). Petitioner alleged that he suffered from small nerve fiber neuropathy as a result of receiving hepatitis B vaccinations on May 5, 1999, and June 11, 1999.
A Ruling on Entitlement was issued on May 24, 2013, where the special master then assigned to the case found, by a preponderance of the evidence, that petitioner's vaccinations caused his injury.
On January 13, 2015, respondent filed a Proffer on Award of Compensation ("Proffer"). Respondent proffers that based upon her review of the evidence of record, petitioner should be awarded all items of compensation set forth in the life care plan and illustrated by the chart attached to the Proffer at Tab A. These items include: (1) Life Care Expenses: Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded all items of compensation set forth in the life care plan and illustrated by the chart attached at Tab A of the Proffer in the amount of $171,328.49; (2) Lost earnings: respondent proffers that the appropriate award for petitioner's lost earnings is $1,825,876.55; (3) Pain and Suffering: respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $241,696.16, in actual and projected pain and suffering, and (4) Past Unreimbursable Expenses: respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $116,264.95. Petitioner agrees with the proffered award for each item of compensation. Petitioner further represents that there are no Medicaid liens outstanding against him.
Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards the following:
A. A lump sum payment of $2,355,166.15, in the form of a check payable to petitioner, [REDACTED\], representing compensation for life care expenses to be incurred during the first year after judgment ($171,328.49), lost earnings ($1,825,876.55), pain and suffering ($241,696.16), and past unreimbursable expenses ($116,264.95).
B. An amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract, subject to the conditions described in the Proffer and the attachments to that Proffer.
Proffer ¶ II.
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT herewith.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
[REDACTED\]
Petitioner, No. 01-707V
Special Master Dorsey
v. ECF
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
RESPONDENT'S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
I. Items of Compensation
A. Life Care Items
Respondent engaged life care planner Linda Curtis, RN, MS, CCM, CNCLP, and petitioner engaged Roberta Hurley, Hurley & Econs Consulting, to provide an estimation of [REDACTED\]'s future vaccine-injury related needs. For the purposes of this proffer, the term "vaccine related" is as described in former Chief Special Master Campbell-Smith's Ruling on Entitlement filed May 24, 2013. All items of compensation identified in the life care plan are supported by the evidence, and are illustrated by the chart entitled Appendix A: Items of Compensation for [REDACTED\], attached hereto as Tab A.1 Respondent proffers that [REDACTED\] should be awarded all items of compensation set forth in the life care plan and illustrated by the chart attached at Tab A. Petitioner agrees.
B. Lost Earnings
The parties agree that based upon the evidence of record, [REDACTED\] has suffered a past loss of earnings and will continue to suffer loss of earnings in the future. Therefore, respondent proffers that [REDACTED\] should be awarded lost earnings as provided under the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(A). Respondent proffers that the appropriate award for [REDACTED\]'s lost earnings is $1,825,876.55. Petitioner agrees.
C. Pain and Suffering
Respondent proffers that [REDACTED\] should be awarded $241,696.16 in actual and projected pain and suffering. This amount reflects that any award for projected pain and suffering has been reduced to net present value. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.
D. Past Unreimbursable Expenses
Evidence supplied by petitioner documents [REDACTED\]'s expenditure of past unreimbursable expenses related to his vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $116,264.95. Petitioner agrees.
E. Medicaid Lien
Petitioner represents that there are no Medicaid liens outstanding against him.
II. Form of the Award
The parties recommend that the compensation provided to [REDACTED\] should be made through a combination of lump sum payments and future annuity payments as described below, and request that the Special Master's decision and the Court's judgment award the following:2
A. A lump sum payment of $2,355,166.15, representing compensation for life care expenses expected to be incurred during the first year after judgment ($171,328.49), lost earnings ($1,825,876.55), pain and suffering ($241,696.16), and past unreimbursable expenses ($116,264.95), in the form of a check payable to petitioner, [REDACTED\].
B. An amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract,3 subject to the conditions described below, that will provide payments for the life care items contained in the life care plan, as illustrated by the chart at Tab A, attached hereto, paid to the life insurance company4 from which the annuity will be purchased.5 Compensation for Year Two (beginning on the first anniversary of the date of judgment) and all subsequent years shall be provided through respondent's purchase of an annuity, which annuity shall make payments directly to petitioner, [REDACTED\], only so long as [REDACTED\] is alive at the time a particular payment is due. At the Secretary's sole discretion, the periodic payments may be provided to petitioner in monthly, quarterly, annual or other installments. The "annual amounts" set forth in the chart at Tab A describe only the total yearly sum to be paid to petitioner and do not require that the payment be made in one annual installment.
1. Growth Rate
Respondent proffers that a four percent (4%) growth rate should be applied to all non-medical life care items, and a five percent (5%) growth rate should be applied to all medical life care items. Thus, the benefits illustrated in the chart at Tab A that are to be paid through annuity payments should grow as follows: four percent (4%) compounded annually from the date of judgment for non-medical items, and five percent (5%) compounded annually from the date of judgment for medical items. Petitioner agrees.
2. Life-contingent annuity
Petitioner will continue to receive the annuity payments from the Life Insurance Company only so long as he, [REDACTED\], is alive at the time that a particular payment is due. Written notice shall be provided to the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Life Insurance Company within twenty (20) days of [REDACTED\]'s death.
3. Guardianship
Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
III. Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment
A. Lump Sum paid to petitioner, [REDACTED\]: $2,355,166.15
B. An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described above in section II. B.
Respectfully submitted,
JOYCE R. BRANDA
Acting Assistant Attorney General
RUPA BHATTACHARYYA
Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
VINCENT J. MATANOSKI
Deputy Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
HEATHER L. PEARLMAN
Senior Trial Attorney
Torts Branch, Civil Division
S/Alexis B. Babcock
ALEXIS B. BABCOCK
Senior Trial Attorney
Torts Branch, Civil Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 146
Benjamin Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
Telephone: (202) 616-7678
Dated: January 13, 2015