Filed: Apr. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 07, 2014
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION MARK E. WALKER, District Judge. This Court has considered the Magistrate's Order and Report and Recommendation, ECF No.32, filed March 17, 2014. No objection has been filed by Plaintiff to ECF No. 32. Upon consideration IT IS ORDERED: The report and recommendation, ECF No. 32, is accepted and adopted as the Court's opinion. Defendant Schentrup's Motion to dismiss, ECF No. 25, is denied as moot inasmuch as Plaintiff was granted leave to amend his
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION MARK E. WALKER, District Judge. This Court has considered the Magistrate's Order and Report and Recommendation, ECF No.32, filed March 17, 2014. No objection has been filed by Plaintiff to ECF No. 32. Upon consideration IT IS ORDERED: The report and recommendation, ECF No. 32, is accepted and adopted as the Court's opinion. Defendant Schentrup's Motion to dismiss, ECF No. 25, is denied as moot inasmuch as Plaintiff was granted leave to amend his ..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
MARK E. WALKER, District Judge.
This Court has considered the Magistrate's Order and Report and Recommendation, ECF No.32, filed March 17, 2014. No objection has been filed by Plaintiff to ECF No. 32. Upon consideration
IT IS ORDERED:
The report and recommendation, ECF No. 32, is accepted and adopted as the Court's opinion. Defendant Schentrup's Motion to dismiss, ECF No. 25, is denied as moot inasmuch as Plaintiff was granted leave to amend his complaint to sue in his personal capacity, not as a trustee, in the Magistrates Order of March 17, 2014. ECF No. 32. Defendant Urra's Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 28, is granted. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Urra are dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim.
Inasmuch as ECF No. 29, the original Report and Recommendation, is superseded by the Order and Report and Recommendation dated March 17, 2014, ECF No. 32, the original Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 29, is termed as moot. Plaintiff's Motion to Amend (Third) Complaint, ECF No. 31, is granted in that Plaintiff has been permitted to file a Fourth Amended Complaint so that he can file in his personal capacity and, if necessary, cite authority on which he relies, ECF No. 32, and thus ECF NO. 31 shall also be termed.
SO ORDERED.
