U.S. v. HARRIS, 3:08cr47/MCR/CJK (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20140605c99
Visitors: 37
Filed: Jun. 03, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 03, 2014
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated October 23, 2013. (Doc. 195). Defendant has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objection
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated October 23, 2013. (Doc. 195). Defendant has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections..
More
ORDER
M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated October 23, 2013. (Doc. 195). Defendant has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The Government's motion to dismiss (doc. 192) is GRANTED, and the motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence (doc. 189) is DENIED and DISMISSED as untimely.
2. A certificate of appealability be DENIED.
Source: Leagle
