MINCEY v. U.S., CR605-031. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20140701901
Visitors: 19
Filed: Jun. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 30, 2014
Summary: ORDER B. AVANT EDENFIELD, District Judge. After a careful de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted as the opinion of the Court. Because Mincey has burdened this Court with multiple successive 2255 motions, he is ENJOINED from filing any further successive motions here absent explicit approval by the
Summary: ORDER B. AVANT EDENFIELD, District Judge. After a careful de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted as the opinion of the Court. Because Mincey has burdened this Court with multiple successive 2255 motions, he is ENJOINED from filing any further successive motions here absent explicit approval by the E..
More
ORDER
B. AVANT EDENFIELD, District Judge.
After a careful de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted as the opinion of the Court. Because Mincey has burdened this Court with multiple successive § 2255 motions, he is ENJOINED from filing any further successive motions here absent explicit approval by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
