U.S. v. SPRUILL, 5:11-cr-43-RS-EMT. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20140404f19
Visitors: 16
Filed: Apr. 03, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 03, 2014
Summary: ORDER RICHARD SMOAK, District Judge. Before me are the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 159) and Petitioner's Objections (Doc. 161). I have considered Petitioner's objections de novo. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is approved and incorporated in this Order. 2. The amended motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence (Doc. 131) is DENIED. 3. The certificate of appealability is DENIED because Defendant did not make a substant
Summary: ORDER RICHARD SMOAK, District Judge. Before me are the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 159) and Petitioner's Objections (Doc. 161). I have considered Petitioner's objections de novo. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is approved and incorporated in this Order. 2. The amended motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence (Doc. 131) is DENIED. 3. The certificate of appealability is DENIED because Defendant did not make a substanti..
More
ORDER
RICHARD SMOAK, District Judge.
Before me are the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 159) and Petitioner's Objections (Doc. 161). I have considered Petitioner's objections de novo.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is approved and incorporated in this Order.
2. The amended motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence (Doc. 131) is DENIED.
3. The certificate of appealability is DENIED because Defendant did not make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.
ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
