REED v. U.S., 2:05-CR-11-WCO-SSC-1 (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20120619919
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 18, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2012
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM C. O'KELLEY, Senior District Judge. The captioned case is before the court for consideration of the magistrate judge's final report and recommendation ("R&R") [250] dated May 29, 2012. Neither party has filed any objections to the R&R as permitted by statute. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). The court has reviewed the record and is confident that the magistrate judge has correctly applied the relevant law to the facts of this case. Accordingly, the R&R [250] is hereby APPROVED an
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM C. O'KELLEY, Senior District Judge. The captioned case is before the court for consideration of the magistrate judge's final report and recommendation ("R&R") [250] dated May 29, 2012. Neither party has filed any objections to the R&R as permitted by statute. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). The court has reviewed the record and is confident that the magistrate judge has correctly applied the relevant law to the facts of this case. Accordingly, the R&R [250] is hereby APPROVED and..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM C. O'KELLEY, Senior District Judge.
The captioned case is before the court for consideration of the magistrate judge's final report and recommendation ("R&R") [250] dated May 29, 2012.
Neither party has filed any objections to the R&R as permitted by statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The court has reviewed the record and is confident that the magistrate judge has correctly applied the relevant law to the facts of this case.
Accordingly, the R&R [250] is hereby APPROVED and ADOPTED as the order of this court. Therefore, for the reasons set forth in the R&R, these two motions, construed together as a single § 2255, are hereby DISMISSED as time-barred.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
