Miller v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 16-5597. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20180601f86
Visitors: 10
Filed: May 31, 2018
Latest Update: May 31, 2018
Summary: ORDER JOEL H. SLOMSKY , District Judge . AND NOW , this 31st day of May 2018, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 51); Defendant's Memorandum in Support of the Motion (Doc. No. 53); Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 63); Defendant's Reply in Support of the Motion (Doc. No. 69); Defendant's Supplemental Memorandum of Law in Support of the Motion (Doc. No. 81); Plaintiffs' Supplemental Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the Motion (Doc. No. 82);
Summary: ORDER JOEL H. SLOMSKY , District Judge . AND NOW , this 31st day of May 2018, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 51); Defendant's Memorandum in Support of the Motion (Doc. No. 53); Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 63); Defendant's Reply in Support of the Motion (Doc. No. 69); Defendant's Supplemental Memorandum of Law in Support of the Motion (Doc. No. 81); Plaintiffs' Supplemental Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the Motion (Doc. No. 82); ..
More
ORDER
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 31st day of May 2018, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 51); Defendant's Memorandum in Support of the Motion (Doc. No. 53); Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 63); Defendant's Reply in Support of the Motion (Doc. No. 69); Defendant's Supplemental Memorandum of Law in Support of the Motion (Doc. No. 81); Plaintiffs' Supplemental Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the Motion (Doc. No. 82); the arguments of counsel for the parties at the December 21, 2017 hearing; and in accordance with the Opinion issued on this day, it is ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 51) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
