Jackson v. Dozier, 5:18-CV-37 (MTT). (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20180914i69
Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 13, 2018
Summary: ORDER MARC T. TREADWELL , District Judge . United States Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle recommends denying Plaintiff Miguel Jackson's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 9) because the Plaintiff is no longer placed in the Special Management Unit and cannot otherwise meet his burden to establish that he is entitled to a preliminary injunction. Doc. 22 at 1. The Plaintiff has not objected to the Recommendation. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), the Court has reviewed the Recommendat
Summary: ORDER MARC T. TREADWELL , District Judge . United States Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle recommends denying Plaintiff Miguel Jackson's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 9) because the Plaintiff is no longer placed in the Special Management Unit and cannot otherwise meet his burden to establish that he is entitled to a preliminary injunction. Doc. 22 at 1. The Plaintiff has not objected to the Recommendation. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), the Court has reviewed the Recommendati..
More
ORDER
MARC T. TREADWELL, District Judge.
United States Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle recommends denying Plaintiff Miguel Jackson's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 9) because the Plaintiff is no longer placed in the Special Management Unit and cannot otherwise meet his burden to establish that he is entitled to a preliminary injunction. Doc. 22 at 1. The Plaintiff has not objected to the Recommendation. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has reviewed the Recommendation and accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. The Recommendation (Doc. 22) is ADOPTED and made the order of this Court. Accordingly, the Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 9) is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
