CROWDER v. I-SCREM, LLC, CV413-276. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20150803563
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 30, 2015
Summary: ORDER G.R. SMITH , Magistrate Judge . This case has been sitting inactive on the Court's docket for nine months after discovery ended on October 20, 2014. Doc. 13 at 2. Within 14 days of the date this Order is served, plaintiff shall show why the Court should not administratively close this case without prejudice to the right of any party with standing to reopen it. See, e.g., In re Heritage Southwest Medical Group PA, 464 F. App'x 285, 287 (5th Cir. 2012) ("[A]dministrative closure does
Summary: ORDER G.R. SMITH , Magistrate Judge . This case has been sitting inactive on the Court's docket for nine months after discovery ended on October 20, 2014. Doc. 13 at 2. Within 14 days of the date this Order is served, plaintiff shall show why the Court should not administratively close this case without prejudice to the right of any party with standing to reopen it. See, e.g., In re Heritage Southwest Medical Group PA, 464 F. App'x 285, 287 (5th Cir. 2012) ("[A]dministrative closure does ..
More
ORDER
G.R. SMITH, Magistrate Judge.
This case has been sitting inactive on the Court's docket for nine months after discovery ended on October 20, 2014. Doc. 13 at 2. Within 14 days of the date this Order is served, plaintiff shall show why the Court should not administratively close this case without prejudice to the right of any party with standing to reopen it. See, e.g., In re Heritage Southwest Medical Group PA, 464 F. App'x 285, 287 (5th Cir. 2012) ("[A]dministrative closure does not have any effect on the rights of the parties and is simply a docket-management device.").
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
