Mizelle v. Wellpath LLC, CV 119-198. (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20200224824
Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 21, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: ORDER BRIAN K. EPPS , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is the parties' consent motion that no party, including the medical Defendants, is required to file an additional answer to Plaintiff's amended complaint. (Doc. no. 72.) Specifically, the parties ask the Court to accept the medical Defendants' previously filed answers, (doc. nos. 22, 45-60), as answers to Plaintiff's amended complaint, (doc. no. 44). Upon consideration, the Court GRANTS the motion. (Doc. no. 72.) Defendants are not
Summary: ORDER BRIAN K. EPPS , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is the parties' consent motion that no party, including the medical Defendants, is required to file an additional answer to Plaintiff's amended complaint. (Doc. no. 72.) Specifically, the parties ask the Court to accept the medical Defendants' previously filed answers, (doc. nos. 22, 45-60), as answers to Plaintiff's amended complaint, (doc. no. 44). Upon consideration, the Court GRANTS the motion. (Doc. no. 72.) Defendants are not ..
More
ORDER
BRIAN K. EPPS, Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is the parties' consent motion that no party, including the medical Defendants, is required to file an additional answer to Plaintiff's amended complaint. (Doc. no. 72.) Specifically, the parties ask the Court to accept the medical Defendants' previously filed answers, (doc. nos. 22, 45-60), as answers to Plaintiff's amended complaint, (doc. no. 44). Upon consideration, the Court GRANTS the motion. (Doc. no. 72.) Defendants are not required to file any additional pleadings in response to Plaintiff's amended complaint.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
