Simmons v. Williams, 6:14-cv-111. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20180307b69
Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 06, 2018
Summary: ORDER J. RANDAL HALL , Chief District Judge . After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, (doc. 101), to which the parties did not file Objections. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court. The Court DENIES the portion of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion to Compel and to Extend the Discover
Summary: ORDER J. RANDAL HALL , Chief District Judge . After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, (doc. 101), to which the parties did not file Objections. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court. The Court DENIES the portion of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion to Compel and to Extend the Discovery..
More
ORDER
J. RANDAL HALL, Chief District Judge.
After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, (doc. 101), to which the parties did not file Objections. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court.
The Court DENIES the portion of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion to Compel and to Extend the Discovery Period seeking dismissal of Plaintiff's Complaint. (Doc. 100.) As noted by the Magistrate Judge, Defendants may file a renewed motion to dismiss in the event Plaintiff fails to appear at his next scheduled deposition or otherwise fails to fulfill his discovery obligations in good faith.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
