Filed: Aug. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 02, 2018
Summary: ORDER ELIZABETH A. KOVACHEVICH , District Judge . This cause is before the Court on: Dkt. 370 Motion Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3613(b) to Terminate Restitution Dkt. 372 Response Defendant Jermaine A. Young, pro se , requests the Court to enter an Order pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3613(b) terminating restitution payment. The Government does not oppose Defendant Young's Motion. Defendant Young was sentenced on February 2, 1996. Restitution in the amount of $8,396.36 was imposed pursuant
Summary: ORDER ELIZABETH A. KOVACHEVICH , District Judge . This cause is before the Court on: Dkt. 370 Motion Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3613(b) to Terminate Restitution Dkt. 372 Response Defendant Jermaine A. Young, pro se , requests the Court to enter an Order pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3613(b) terminating restitution payment. The Government does not oppose Defendant Young's Motion. Defendant Young was sentenced on February 2, 1996. Restitution in the amount of $8,396.36 was imposed pursuant ..
More
ORDER
ELIZABETH A. KOVACHEVICH, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on:
Dkt. 370 Motion Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3613(b) to Terminate Restitution
Dkt. 372 Response
Defendant Jermaine A. Young, pro se, requests the Court to enter an Order pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3613(b) terminating restitution payment.
The Government does not oppose Defendant Young's Motion.
Defendant Young was sentenced on February 2, 1996. Restitution in the amount of $8,396.36 was imposed pursuant to the Victim and Witness Protection Act.
Defendant Young requests termination of restitution because restitution imposed as part of sentencing expired twenty years after entry of judgment. 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3613(b) (1994); United States v. Walker, 698 Fed. Appx. 584 (11th Cir. 2017)(MVRA was enacted on April 24, 1996; MVRA provides that amendments made pursuant to the MVRA are effective for sentencing proceedings in cases in which the defendant is convicted on or after the date of enactment of the Act).
After consideration, the Court grants Defendant Young's Unopposed Motion to Terminate Restitution. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that pro se Defendant Jermaine A. Young's Motion Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3613(b) to Terminate Restitution Payment (Dkt. 370) is granted.
DONE and ORDERED.