Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Chance v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, 1:16-CV-00376-MAC (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Texas Number: infdco20190307e95 Visitors: 14
Filed: Mar. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 06, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION MARCIA A. CRONE , District Judge . The court referred this case to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for pretrial management. The court has received and considered Judge Hawthorn's report (Doc. No. 138) recommending that the court grant the pending "Joint Motion for Final Approval of Settlement" (Doc. No. 136) and the "Unopposed Motion for Approval of Attorneys' Fees and Expenses." Doc. No. 137. No objections were filed to
More

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The court referred this case to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for pretrial management. The court has received and considered Judge Hawthorn's report (Doc. No. 138) recommending that the court grant the pending "Joint Motion for Final Approval of Settlement" (Doc. No. 136) and the "Unopposed Motion for Approval of Attorneys' Fees and Expenses." Doc. No. 137. No objections were filed to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, and the time for doing so has now passed.

The Court, having considered the Parties' motions, the applicable law, and representations by counsel to Judge Hawthorn at the fairness hearing, FINDS that this case presents a bona fide dispute under the FLSA, and that the settlement agreement is fair and reasonable as to all Parties and reflects an arms' length negotiation and compromise of the disputed claims. Additionally, the Court FINDS that the attorneys' fees and costs paid to class counsel under 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) and the terms of the settlement agreement are reasonable.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report is ADOPTED and that the "Joint Motion for Final Approval of Settlement" (Doc. No. 136) and the "Unopposed Motion for Approval of Attorneys' Fees and Expenses" (Doc. No. 137) are APPROVED.

It is further ORDERED that the Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. Except as otherwise provided for in the settlement agreement, each party shall take nothing on the claims asserted and shall bear its own costs and fees. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement.

The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer