U.S. v. OHMER, 1:15-CR-12. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20151021b64
Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 20, 2015
Summary: ORDER HARRY S. MATTICE, Jr. , District Judge . On September 29, 2015, Magistrate Judge Christopher H. Steger filed a Report and Recommendation recommending (a) the Court accept Defendant's plea of guilty to Count Two of the Superseding Indictment in exchange for the undertakings made by the government in the written plea agreement; (b) the Court adjudicate Defendant guilty of the charges set forth in Count Two of the Superseding Indictment; (c) that a decision on whether to accept the plea
Summary: ORDER HARRY S. MATTICE, Jr. , District Judge . On September 29, 2015, Magistrate Judge Christopher H. Steger filed a Report and Recommendation recommending (a) the Court accept Defendant's plea of guilty to Count Two of the Superseding Indictment in exchange for the undertakings made by the government in the written plea agreement; (b) the Court adjudicate Defendant guilty of the charges set forth in Count Two of the Superseding Indictment; (c) that a decision on whether to accept the plea ..
More
ORDER
HARRY S. MATTICE, Jr., District Judge.
On September 29, 2015, Magistrate Judge Christopher H. Steger filed a Report and Recommendation recommending (a) the Court accept Defendant's plea of guilty to Count Two of the Superseding Indictment in exchange for the undertakings made by the government in the written plea agreement; (b) the Court adjudicate Defendant guilty of the charges set forth in Count Two of the Superseding Indictment; (c) that a decision on whether to accept the plea agreement be deferred until sentencing; and (d) Defendant shall remain in custody pending sentencing in this matter (Doc. 214). Neither party filed an objection within the given fourteen days. After reviewing the record, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the magistrate judge's report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and ORDERS as follows:
(1) Defendant's plea of guilty to Count Two of the Superseding Indictment, in exchange for the undertakings made by the government in the written plea agreement, is ACCEPTED;
(2) Defendant is hereby ADJUDGED guilty of the charges set forth in Count Two of the Superseding Indictment;
(3) A decision on whether to accept the plea agreement is DEFERRED until sentencing; and
(4) Defendant SHALL REMAIN IN CUSTODY pending sentencing on Monday, March 14, 2016, at 9:00 am.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
