McGill v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 3:17cv00131. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20180813a77
Visitors: 2
Filed: Aug. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 10, 2018
Summary: DECISION AND ENTRY THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #12), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report an
Summary: DECISION AND ENTRY THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #12), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and..
More
DECISION AND ENTRY
THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #12), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendations docketed on July 25, 2018 (Doc. #12) is ADOPTED in full;
2. The Commissioner's non-disability finding is vacated;
3. No finding is made as to whether Plaintiff Rose A. McGill was under a "disability" within the meaning of the Social Security Act;
4. This case is remanded to the Commissioner and the Administrative Law Judge under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g) for further consideration consistent with the Report and Recommendations and this Decision and Entry; and
5. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
