Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security, 17-CV-12666. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20180820c19
Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 17, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 14), DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 10), and GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 12) GEORGE CARAM STEEH , District Judge . Plaintiff Priscilla Jones brought this action challenging defendant Commissioner of Social Security's denial of her claim for social security disability benefits. Before the court are the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment, which were referred to the mag
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 14), DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 10), and GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 12) GEORGE CARAM STEEH , District Judge . Plaintiff Priscilla Jones brought this action challenging defendant Commissioner of Social Security's denial of her claim for social security disability benefits. Before the court are the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment, which were referred to the magi..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 14), DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 10), and GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 12)
GEORGE CARAM STEEH, District Judge.
Plaintiff Priscilla Jones brought this action challenging defendant Commissioner of Social Security's denial of her claim for social security disability benefits. Before the court are the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment, which were referred to the magistrate judge for a report and recommendation. On July 31, 2018, Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen issued his report, recommending that defendant's motion be granted, and plaintiff's motion be denied.
The magistrate judge specifically stated that any objections to his report were to be filed within 14 days of service, and that failure to file such objections constituted a waiver of any further right to appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985). No such objections were filed by either party and the time period for doing so has expired.
The court has reviewed the record and briefing in this matter, as well as the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, and adopts the result recommended therein. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 10) is DENIED, defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 12) is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
