U.S. v. AIKENS, 5:12-cr-5-RS (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20140723b06
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 22, 2014
Summary: ORDER RICHARD SMOAK, District Judge. Before me are the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 669), and Petitioner's Objections (Doc. 670). I have reviewed the objection de novo. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is approved and incorporated in this Order. 2. The Defendant's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Doc. 667) is summarily DENIED and DISMISSED as untimely. 4. The certificate of appeala
Summary: ORDER RICHARD SMOAK, District Judge. Before me are the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 669), and Petitioner's Objections (Doc. 670). I have reviewed the objection de novo. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is approved and incorporated in this Order. 2. The Defendant's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Doc. 667) is summarily DENIED and DISMISSED as untimely. 4. The certificate of appealab..
More
ORDER
RICHARD SMOAK, District Judge.
Before me are the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 669), and Petitioner's Objections (Doc. 670). I have reviewed the objection de novo.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is approved and incorporated in this Order.
2. The Defendant's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 667) is summarily DENIED and DISMISSED as untimely.
4. The certificate of appealability is DENIED because Petitioner did not make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.
3. The clerk is directed to close the file.
ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
