U.S. v. HIRONS, 12-cv-1268-JPG-SCW. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20140620b92
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jun. 19, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 19, 2014
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Report of Sale filed by the plaintiff United States of America (Doc. 19). The Report of Sale indicates that notice of the sale of the subject property was published in the Mt. Vernon Register-News on January 11, 18 and 25, 2014, and that the sale was conducted January 29, 2014, four days after the final date of publication. However, Illinois foreclosure law, which governs this proceeding, provides
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Report of Sale filed by the plaintiff United States of America (Doc. 19). The Report of Sale indicates that notice of the sale of the subject property was published in the Mt. Vernon Register-News on January 11, 18 and 25, 2014, and that the sale was conducted January 29, 2014, four days after the final date of publication. However, Illinois foreclosure law, which governs this proceeding, provides t..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Report of Sale filed by the plaintiff United States of America (Doc. 19). The Report of Sale indicates that notice of the sale of the subject property was published in the Mt. Vernon Register-News on January 11, 18 and 25, 2014, and that the sale was conducted January 29, 2014, four days after the final date of publication. However, Illinois foreclosure law, which governs this proceeding, provides that the final notice must be published at least seven days before the sale. 735 ILCS 5/15-1507(c)(2). In light of this deficiency, the Court ORDERS the United States to SHOW CAUSE on or before July 3, 2014, why the Court should not reject the Report of Sale. The failure to respond in a timely manner will be construed as an admission that the Report of Sale should be rejected and that the Court should order a new sale.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
