Clancy v. Shanahan, 18-4106-SAC. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Kansas
Number: infdco20190514a41
Visitors: 8
Filed: May 13, 2019
Latest Update: May 13, 2019
Summary: ORDER JAMES P. O'HARA , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff has filed a motion (ECF No. 80) to reschedule the pretrial conference, set by the scheduling order for May 21, 2019, at 1:00 p.m. in Courtroom 223 in the United States Courthouse in Kansas City, Kansas. 1 Because plaintiff has not shown good cause to amend the scheduling order, the motion is denied. Plaintiff requests the pretrial conference be rescheduled because she recently received a notice, dated May 3, 2019, from U.S. Citizensh
Summary: ORDER JAMES P. O'HARA , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff has filed a motion (ECF No. 80) to reschedule the pretrial conference, set by the scheduling order for May 21, 2019, at 1:00 p.m. in Courtroom 223 in the United States Courthouse in Kansas City, Kansas. 1 Because plaintiff has not shown good cause to amend the scheduling order, the motion is denied. Plaintiff requests the pretrial conference be rescheduled because she recently received a notice, dated May 3, 2019, from U.S. Citizenshi..
More
ORDER
JAMES P. O'HARA, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff has filed a motion (ECF No. 80) to reschedule the pretrial conference, set by the scheduling order for May 21, 2019, at 1:00 p.m. in Courtroom 223 in the United States Courthouse in Kansas City, Kansas.1 Because plaintiff has not shown good cause to amend the scheduling order, the motion is denied.
Plaintiff requests the pretrial conference be rescheduled because she recently received a notice, dated May 3, 2019, from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services setting an immigration appointment for May 21, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. in St. Louis, Missouri. The pretrial conference in this case was scheduled nearly seven months ago—long before the immigration appointment was set this month. The notice states plaintiff may request to reschedule her immigration appointment. Plaintiff's motion is silent about what efforts, if any, she has taken to reschedule her immigration appointment. The court finds plaintiff, therefore, has not demonstrated good cause to reschedule the pretrial conference.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. See ECF No. 33 (scheduling order). Plaintiff's motion mistakenly states the pretrial conference is by telephone. Plaintiff is reminded she must appear for the conference in person, in the courtroom.
Source: Leagle
