Filed: Jul. 09, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 09, 2013
Summary: ORDER JOHN ANTOON, District Judge. This case is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, or, alternatively, Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 23) filed March 11, 2013. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the motion be granted in part and denied in part. After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of l
Summary: ORDER JOHN ANTOON, District Judge. This case is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, or, alternatively, Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 23) filed March 11, 2013. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the motion be granted in part and denied in part. After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of la..
More
ORDER
JOHN ANTOON, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, or, alternatively, Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 23) filed March 11, 2013. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the motion be granted in part and denied in part.
After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Report and Recommendation filed June 13, 2013 (Doc. No. 36) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.
2. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, or, alternatively, Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. No. 23) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
3. The Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Count I (hostile work environment) and Count III (judicial review).
4. The Motion for Summary Judgment (and alternative motion to dismiss) as to Count II (retaliation) is DENIED.
5. This case will proceed as to Count II only.
DONE and ORDERED.
