CURTIS v. MATHEWS, 7:10-CV-54 (HL). (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20120806540
Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 03, 2012
Latest Update: Aug. 03, 2012
Summary: ORDER HUGH LAWSON, Senior Judge. This case is before the Court on an Order and Recommendation (Doc. 51) in which United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff recommends that the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 42) filed by Defendant Khurana and the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 46) filed by Defendants Mathews and Norman be granted. Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation for clear error and finds none. Accordingly, the R
Summary: ORDER HUGH LAWSON, Senior Judge. This case is before the Court on an Order and Recommendation (Doc. 51) in which United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff recommends that the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 42) filed by Defendant Khurana and the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 46) filed by Defendants Mathews and Norman be granted. Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation for clear error and finds none. Accordingly, the Re..
More
ORDER
HUGH LAWSON, Senior Judge.
This case is before the Court on an Order and Recommendation (Doc. 51) in which United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff recommends that the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 42) filed by Defendant Khurana and the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 46) filed by Defendants Mathews and Norman be granted. Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation for clear error and finds none. Accordingly, the Recommendation is accepted and adopted. Defendant Khurana's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 42) is granted. Defendants Mathews and Norman's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 46) is granted. The Clerk is directed to close this case.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
